<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rossander's Security Reader &#187; patch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rossander.org/infosec/tag/patch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rossander.org/infosec</link>
	<description>an Information Security blog for the rest of us</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 01:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Security hype</title>
		<link>http://rossander.org/infosec/2008/12/security-hype/</link>
		<comments>http://rossander.org/infosec/2008/12/security-hype/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Rossander</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rossander.org/infosec/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vendors say "patch immediately".  What bad happens if you wait a few days?  Nothing as long as the rest of your layers of security are strong.  But don't ignore it forever.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Brenner of CSO Online ran a column recently about <a href=http://www.csoonline.com/article/394163/FUD_Watch_Patch_Tuesday_Panic_No_Thanks?contentId=394163&#038;slug=&#038;source=nlt_csotechwatch>fear and hype by the security vendors</a>, especially around the need to &#8220;immediately patch the latest critical vulnerability&#8221; in a piece of software.</p>
<p><a href=http://rossander.org/infosec/?p=52>Patches</a> fix holes in the vendor&#8217;s software and keep hackers from being able to walk through the back door of your system.  Applying patches is important.  Security vendors want you to apply the patch immediately in case the hackers are pounding on your door right now.  Every minute you wait is a minute of exposure.</p>
<p>But most of us don&#8217;t apply the patches immediately.  It takes your IT shop a few days of testing to make sure the patch won&#8217;t  break something else and to tweak the network so everything runs properly again.  With so many companies ignoring the vendors, why haven&#8217;t we had a catastrophic <a href=http://what-is-what.com/what_is/zero_day_exploit.html>zero-day attack</a> yet?</p>
<p>The truth is that most responsible IT departments use a layered approach to security.  They have tools and policies that will generally keep out the malicious software for long enough for IT to complete the tests and apply the patches in an orderly fashion.</p>
<p>So who does get hacked?  According to a recent <a href=http://www.verizonbusiness.com/resources/security/databreachreport.pdf>Verizon report</a>, nine out of ten data breaches could have been prevented if the company had taken reasonable security measures, most often applying patches that had been available for years.  As Brenner points out, why should a hacker bother to write a complicated new virus to exploit the latest hole when you can still make money walking through holes that should have been patched four years ago?</p>
<p>If you have a solid approach to computer security, you can take the time to test the latest patches properly.  On the other hand, if you don&#8217;t have a dedicated IT team, you probably also don&#8217;t have the staff to conduct the testing so you should set the patches to automatically update themselves.</p>
<p>Of course, if you&#8217;re <i>not</i>  guarding your infrastructure with the basics (<a href=http://rossander.org/infosec/?p=54>strong passwords</a>, current <a href=http://rossander.org/infosec/?p=93>anti-virus</a> and <a href=http://rossander.org/infosec/?p=43>anti-spyware</a>, <a href=http://rossander.org/infosec/?p=48>firewalls</a>, up-to-date on patches even if not up-to-the-minute, etc.), you need to start now.</p>
<div align=right><small><i>From <a href=http://infosec.westfieldinsurance.com/2008/12/security-hype.html>westfieldinsurance.com</a></i></small></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rossander.org/infosec/2008/12/security-hype/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

