<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Rossander's Security Reader</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rossander.org/infosec/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rossander.org/infosec</link>
	<description>an Information Security blog for the rest of us</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 13:48:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on CreditKarma.com is an interesting new site by Jimm</title>
		<link>http://rossander.org/infosec/2009/08/creditkarma-com-is-an-interesting-new-site/comment-page-1/#comment-4311</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 13:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rossander.org/infosec/?p=496#comment-4311</guid>
		<description>I love your article. Nice post! thank you for sharing for free. You&#039;d better optimize more your blog, so more people will visit and enjoy your nice posts. If you don&#039;t mind, please also comment on my blog: &lt;a href=&quot;http://overviu.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;overviu.com&lt;/a&gt;. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love your article. Nice post! thank you for sharing for free. You&#8217;d better optimize more your blog, so more people will visit and enjoy your nice posts. If you don&#8217;t mind, please also comment on my blog: <a href="http://overviu.com" rel="nofollow">overviu.com</a>. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not going to be home for the holidays? by Skin Smart</title>
		<link>http://rossander.org/infosec/2009/12/not-going-to-be-home-for-the-holidays/comment-page-1/#comment-3551</link>
		<dc:creator>Skin Smart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rossander.org/infosec/?p=546#comment-3551</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Great Post on this Blog...&lt;/strong&gt;

I saw this really good post today....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Great Post on this Blog&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I saw this really good post today&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 10 rules for talking to a reporter by ヴィトン バッグ</title>
		<link>http://rossander.org/infosec/2009/11/10-rules-for-talking-to-a-reporting/comment-page-1/#comment-3411</link>
		<dc:creator>ヴィトン バッグ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 05:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rossander.org/infosec/?p=531#comment-3411</guid>
		<description>That is the best article i have seen,Thank you  a lot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is the best article i have seen,Thank you  a lot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CreditKarma.com is an interesting new site by Tony Walton</title>
		<link>http://rossander.org/infosec/2009/08/creditkarma-com-is-an-interesting-new-site/comment-page-1/#comment-2795</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Walton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rossander.org/infosec/?p=496#comment-2795</guid>
		<description>Nice review.  Objective.  Informative.

One possibly important thing for your own personal knowledge is FICO doesn&#039;t calculate the same amount of emphasis on having more credit lines as Credit Karma&#039;s formula for middle to lower scores.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice review.  Objective.  Informative.</p>
<p>One possibly important thing for your own personal knowledge is FICO doesn&#8217;t calculate the same amount of emphasis on having more credit lines as Credit Karma&#8217;s formula for middle to lower scores.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How not to look like spam by Tania</title>
		<link>http://rossander.org/infosec/2008/09/how-not-to-look-like-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Tania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 13:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rossander.org/infosec/?p=20#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Hi,
rossander.org - da best. Keep it going!

Have a nice day
Tania</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
rossander.org &#8211; da best. Keep it going!</p>
<p>Have a nice day<br />
Tania</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Latitude and privacy erosion by Mike Rossander</title>
		<link>http://rossander.org/infosec/2009/02/google-latitude-and-privacy-erosion/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Rossander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rossander.org/infosec/?p=393#comment-20</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right that the government has been able to subpoena cell phone records for a while now (though the roll-out of 911 traceability is still largely only implemented in urban areas - according to my local police dept, they haven&#039;t been able to implement it properly even in our suburban township).

The difference here, I think, is one of degree.  It will now far easier than it used to be.  My local township no longer has to develop any technical skills because Google has solved it for them.  That pushes the ability to be intrusive to many more agencies.  It also opens up the traceability to non-governmental agencies.  Big Brother is bad enough - now we have to worry about little brother (other businesses and even individuals), too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right that the government has been able to subpoena cell phone records for a while now (though the roll-out of 911 traceability is still largely only implemented in urban areas &#8211; according to my local police dept, they haven&#8217;t been able to implement it properly even in our suburban township).</p>
<p>The difference here, I think, is one of degree.  It will now far easier than it used to be.  My local township no longer has to develop any technical skills because Google has solved it for them.  That pushes the ability to be intrusive to many more agencies.  It also opens up the traceability to non-governmental agencies.  Big Brother is bad enough &#8211; now we have to worry about little brother (other businesses and even individuals), too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Latitude and privacy erosion by Geoff</title>
		<link>http://rossander.org/infosec/2009/02/google-latitude-and-privacy-erosion/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rossander.org/infosec/?p=393#comment-19</guid>
		<description>&quot;I am extremely uncomfortable with the thought that anyone could so easily monitor my movements.&quot;  I think you&#039;re being a little naive.

The government doesn&#039;t need Google&#039;s Latitude to do this, the cellphone providers do it for them already.

All cellphones have been &#039;trackable&#039; for a few years, ostensibly to allow 911 calls to be located. 

Big Brother is watching you, get used to it! Just remember that if it&#039;s the government doing it they&#039;ll lose the file or screw it up anyway. 

If you want to complain about something, save yourself for when you start getting targeted ads directing you to businesses according to your location, oh wait, Google and Yahoo already do that. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I am extremely uncomfortable with the thought that anyone could so easily monitor my movements.&#8221;  I think you&#8217;re being a little naive.</p>
<p>The government doesn&#8217;t need Google&#8217;s Latitude to do this, the cellphone providers do it for them already.</p>
<p>All cellphones have been &#8216;trackable&#8217; for a few years, ostensibly to allow 911 calls to be located. </p>
<p>Big Brother is watching you, get used to it! Just remember that if it&#8217;s the government doing it they&#8217;ll lose the file or screw it up anyway. </p>
<p>If you want to complain about something, save yourself for when you start getting targeted ads directing you to businesses according to your location, oh wait, Google and Yahoo already do that. <img src='http://rossander.org/infosec/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Patching for personal computers by Popular People &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Randomnimities :: the Blog » Blog Archive » After Years of Necking &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://rossander.org/infosec/2009/02/patching-for-personal-computers/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Popular People &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Randomnimities :: the Blog » Blog Archive » After Years of Necking &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 10:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rossander.org/infosec/?p=386#comment-10</guid>
		<description>[...] Patching for personal computers « Information Security for the &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Patching for personal computers « Information Security for the &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Breach disclosure = class action lawsuit by Breach disclosure = class action lawsuit &#124; Business and Financial Blog</title>
		<link>http://rossander.org/infosec/2009/02/breach-disclosure-class-action-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Breach disclosure = class action lawsuit &#124; Business and Financial Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 06:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rossander.org/infosec/?p=395#comment-9</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post: Breach disclosure = class action lawsuit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post: Breach disclosure = class action lawsuit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Security of hosted email by Industrial Shredders</title>
		<link>http://rossander.org/infosec/2008/06/security-of-hosted-email-the-last-mile/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Industrial Shredders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rossander.org/infosec/?p=31#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Identity theft has brought great tensions to the corporate world causing many companieslosses each year. Everyone is scared of their personal information not leaked out tosome strangers. Not only offices but individuals at home should also purchase onefor safety.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Identity theft has brought great tensions to the corporate world causing many companieslosses each year. Everyone is scared of their personal information not leaked out tosome strangers. Not only offices but individuals at home should also purchase onefor safety.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
